This blog series began by exploring the ‘law of attraction’ as derived from ‘The Secret’ (Yes, I am still saying it in hushed tones!) Last entry dealt with the question, ‘Do Opposites Attract?’ My answer, no, but differences can be attractive. In this post, I want to pick up with the last thing I said last time, which is that when it comes to building relationships, common ground is essential.
Like Attracted To Like
Ok, I’m going to let the researchers from the Iowa Marital Assessment Program share their work, then I’ll comment some more.
![]()
“People may be attracted to those who have similar attitudes, values, and beliefs, and even marry them – at least in part – on the basis of this similarity because attitudes are highly visible and salient characteristics and they are fundamental to the way people lead their lives…However, once people are in a committed relationship, it is primarily personality similarity that influences marital happiness because being in a committed relationship entails regular interaction and requires extensive coordination in dealing with tasks, issues and problems of daily living.”
Is it just me, or is this maddeningly obtuse? Personality similarity? Does that mean that two analytical socializers are going to be happy together? And if so, how do you explain the fact that in almost every successful couple I have known, there’s a more gregarious person with an often shy person, or someone with lots of libido with someone who has low libido, or someone with strong social leanings with someone who prefers their own company.
Let’s Define Terms
As for putting attitudes, values and beliefs in the same collection…I think that makes for a muddier set of study results. Let me define my terms. Attitudes = our motivations and opinions about things. Values = that which we deem important enough to use as the bedrock of our lives. Beliefs = assumptions, limiting or useful, formed through generalization, deletion and distortion of the available data.
Of course, I should ask my wife, she reads different things into this kind of stuff than I do. But it seems that the researchers are attributing personality distinctions to their subjects that are actually behavioral in nature. And if you remove the word personality from their writing, it doesn’t cost you anything and the meaning becomes clearer, people like people who are like them in some very basic ways.
Common Ground Found In Shared Values
I believe the most powerful common ground in relationships is that of shared values. If you and another person believe or think the same kinds of things and experiences are important, you’ll be able to work together to problem solve and share the positive results after. If you deem the same things to be the important things, when divisions arise, your shared values will hold you together.
Couples who build their relationships on the common ground of values can survive all kinds of life cycle events, even thrive, in spite of the differences that inevitably arise. But couples that lack shared values are likely doomed, regardless of how much else they have in common, to fight over and eventually move away from each other because of the lack of this basic bond.
When Values Are Different, Blend With Behavior
In lieu of having shared values with people we seek to work with, lead, manage or persuade, our main vector of approach is through behavioral blending. That’s where we send signals to others that we are on the same side. Since we people are more alike than different anyway, finding common ground ought to be a fairly simple proposition. Yet most people find it incredibly hard to do when their attention is on the differences that divide us one from another. That’s why the idea of blending is to move to common ground as quickly as possible.
Something as seemingly inconsequential as how fast or slow you talk, how loud or quiet you are, how assertive or passive you are, and even whether you’re standing or sitting, can have profoundly powerful effects on people sorting through their differences. They create enough of a connection, enough of a sense of common ground, that you may actually succeed in identifying more meaningful areas of common interest, and even work together for some soon to be agreed upon common good.
The Bottom Line In Resolving Conflict
A limo driver in Connecticut asked me as we drove to my hotel, ‘What are you here for?” I told him, “To give a speech.” “What about?,” he inquired. “Dealing with difficult people,” I told him. He practically swerved off the road, as he turned around and asked me, point blank, “HOW DO YOU DO THAT?” I told him I’d be happy to tell him if he promised to keep his eyes on the road, and apparently getting an answer to his question was important enough to get him to do just that. And there I was, asked for the bottom line of what I teach people. Here’s what I said, that day, and I’ve been saying it ever since:
“When we, as people, stand together on some common ground, we can resolve any differences that face us, overcome any challenge that threatens us. But when we stand apart and emphasize our differences, no solution is possible, because nobody cooperates with anybody who seems to be against them.”
I Offer You A Helping Hand
If you’d like to listen free to a $49 one hour audio program on “Dealing With People You Can’t Stand: How To Bring Out The Best In People At Their Worst,” simply head on over to LearnToPersuade.com. It’s fast paced, funny, and filled with great ideas for meeting people where they are and persuading them to change their bad behavior into something more productive.
I’m eager to hear your thoughts on common ground as the basis of successful persuasion and conflict resolution. Next post, I’ll talk about the real world practicality of visualization and affirmation, as opposed to the kind of fuzzy thinking about it promoted in ‘The Secret.’
Until then or sooner, be well,
Rick





{ 14 comments… read them below or add one }
If you weren’t so right, you wouldn’t be so good.
“Something as seemingly inconsequential as how fast or slow you talk, how loud or quiet you are, how assertive or passive you are, and even whether you’re standing or sitting, can have profoundly powerful effects on people sorting through their differences”
Reminds me of why matching/mirroring works. Little things mean a lot.
“when we stand apart and emphasize our differences, no solution is possible, because nobody cooperates with anybody who seems to be against them.”
Oh so true. This follows the golden rule of “rapport before influence.” It also reminds me to check our ABC’s:
- Agree – agree when you agree.
- Build – build on common ground.
- Compare – compare when you differ; it’s not about right or wrong.
A colleague of mine once noted that I was a ‘different person’ with every member of our team. She said it wasn’t a bad thing as I clearly morphed into someone who related better to each individual person. I know I do this but wasn’t aware of how it might look to others and it’s not deliberate either. It’s always been my way which is possibly why I have very varied friends who I get along with but who do not and cannot get along with each other.
More on this later, cooker timer just beeped!
Excellent, J.D.!
I love that ABC acronym…in fact, comparing when you differ is part of the advice I gave the local city council members when they have conflict on issues. I suggested that they compare for what they agree on first, in order to define their disagreement as narrowly as possible, then sort through the various criteria they are trying to satisfy, and brainstorm on possible ways of getting there. Thanks for your insight, always welcome!
And creativeblogger, I know exactly what you mean (I swear I do!) This morphing phenomenon is something I may explore in my next book on connection. But I notice that when I speak in different parts of the country, my accent changes. In the Northeast, I sound like something akin to a New Yorker. In the south, my Mom’s accent seems to come through me. When I’m in England, I speak English proper! Scotland, I can almost hear Scotty from Star Trek. Recently, I did some training work with the government of Trinidad, and I could hear how the almost musical way people speak there seemed to come through the way I presented my training.
This isn’t a matter of volition…it just happened. I suspect this happens with some of us (you and I in this case) because of our sincere interest and authentic connection, and somehow that creates resonance that influences us to sound like the environs we’re in. Of course, this doesn’t necessarily explain Madonna’s acquired British accent. (Or does it?)
I’d love to know more about how it happens, how much it happens with kids moving to new cultures, and why it isn’t a universal phenomenon. Thanks for your comment, keep coming back, I love reading your thoughts!
Back…Basically if people feel intimidated by you for whatever reason ie intelligence, money, power, looks, demeanor etc, they may react with hostility and aggression. Thus the best way to disarm them is remove the source of their fear and show them that you are in fact the same as them. This is easier to achieve than it may seem based on the fact that we should share common ground in some area with every human being on the planet.
For example, a Queen can relate to a peasant when discussing their love of their children. These are common interests and demonstrate a line of similarity which people who feel intimidated require in order to feel safe, to let down their guard and to behave with less aggression and to trust.
The leaders of the world have realised this and thus like to be seen to be doing ‘average’ things in the media. A prime minister in his shorts playing with his kids for example. These images are not accidental they are designed to make the ‘regular’ folk see that these figures are not so different to them after all.
Thus when I am working above others as their manager I try to relate to them in a way they feel is less threatening. I may mirror their behavior, speech patterns, share their interests. Reassure them we are the same.
I know someone who recently was disappointed by not getting an interview for a job she wanted and all my reassurances that it is a very competative environment etc did not help her. Later on I had a similar experience and as soon as I was able, I told her. I knew that this would make her feel better. That my bad news would reassure her that she was not ‘different’ or ‘less’ and that this was a common experience. I was right, she was delighted!
She was able to say : ‘the same thing happened to xxxx, so I am not so different, I am not a failure.’ and so on.
These are the reasons why like attracts like and also of course its nice to share interests. I have dated guys who are different to me and the differences are attractive but only for so long as after a while you miss being able to enjoy a chat about the things you like and become bored hearing about things you do not. In other words the novelty of being different can wear off.
Just read your reply to my ‘pre cooker beeping’ post.
My mother does the old accent morphing thing! I used to find it very annoying as a child but now I can see it’s value. She is fairly musical, so I think her ear for sound my result in this ‘change’ as well as the need to morph in order to relate and disarm.
On the subject of disarming and where this morph quality comes from.
Perhaps it is an ancient survival instinct and we morph as it increases our chances of survival as we do indeed disarm our enemies this way.
I suspect if we look to our animal kingdom we will find areas of study which show animals mimicking others for this purpose. I will Google and if this is indeed the case then I suspect we have our morphing motive and it’s origin!
Love it, creativeblogger, great examples!
You wrote, ” That my bad news would reassure her that she was not ‘different’ or ‘less’ and that this was a common experience. I was right, she was delighted!” And thus, I’m reminded, ‘Misery loves company!’
This phenomenon is important in so many contexts. I notice it sometimes at my speaking engagements and training programs. Walk into a room of unhappy souls and shower them with enthusiasm, and the room begins to change. Some people, attracted to the difference, begin to connect with it. You can practically feel the energy in the room going up.
But not for all. Some people are having a very tough time, and the difference divides. They sink further into their own stuff, separating themselves further and further from the group, until they feel completely alone and isolated. Left in this condition, and given an evaluation, BAM, nasty comments and angry remarks.
How’s a presenter to deal with this divide? One way is to go back and scoop em’ up. Address the difficulties in a way that they recognize as personal and meaningful, and then go back to showering the group with enthusiasm, and lo and behold, along they come. Because, recognizing there is more like and less opposite, they like it better!
Thanks for the comments! Gosh, it makes writing this blog so much more rewarding!! I LIKE YOU BOTH FOR COMMENTING!
best
Rick
BTW, what were you cooking? Something novel? Something familiar? Something someone else loves? Something you’ve been craving? Something I wish you could post so I could sample it?
Here is one link, meanwhile check out Mimicry via wikipedia, it illustrates many great examples of why it is necessary to the survival of many species. It also explains I guess why we see trends in clothing and have fashions, we dress alike as this helps us survive with others to dress that way. Interesting stuff.
http://everything2.com/e2node/Defensive%2520colouring%2520and%2520behaviour%2520in%2520the%2520animal%2520kingdom
Gosh, ask and you shall receive. Fantastic!
Yes, I think you’ve found the explanation, and just in time, I’m working on a chapter that addresses this RIGHT NOW, and had been stumped, but no longer. WOOHOO!
Oh and I was cooking fish fingers, chips and spaghetti a VERY common dinner for children in the UK but I am quite happy to do the old ‘choc ice and chips’ routine at least once so my kids can say they had it and it’s not just a crazy myth.
choc ice btw is icecream surrounded by chocolate.
Happy to be of help re the old ‘why do we this thing’. I find all the answers to these things can be found in nature. I wrote a piece a while back explaining why we ‘love’ and it is I believe fairly original in terms of that point of view. I say this as we thrashed out this topic on a science forum once and I was the only one with this view yet it gathered support.
Here is a link:
http://searchwarp.com/swa214457.htm
Love it! (Just read it!) One of my favorite definitions for love comes from Buckminster Fuller, who called love ‘Metaphysical Gravity.”
Thanks Leah
Rick
P.S. Fish fingers…I LOVE those!
In Googling ‘metaphysical gravity’ I came across a pdf document that directed me to look up this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fnord
I think you will find the content rather interesting!!
In Googling ‘metaphysical love’ I came across a pdf document that directed me to this…rather interesting!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fnord
{ 1 trackback }