<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Persuasive Communication: Asking for Permission</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theartofchange.com/wordpress/persuasion/persuasion-communication-asking-for-permission/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theartofchange.com/wordpress/persuasion/persuasion-communication-asking-for-permission</link>
	<description>Change is inevitable.  Progress is not.  YOU make the difference.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 07:26:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lessons Learned from Dr. K on Interpersonal Skills and the Art of Persuasion - Sources of Insight</title>
		<link>http://theartofchange.com/wordpress/persuasion/persuasion-communication-asking-for-permission/comment-page-1#comment-3855</link>
		<dc:creator>Lessons Learned from Dr. K on Interpersonal Skills and the Art of Persuasion - Sources of Insight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 06:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drkblog.com/?p=107#comment-3855</guid>
		<description>[...] Asking for Permissions [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Asking for Permissions [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Rick Kirschner</title>
		<link>http://theartofchange.com/wordpress/persuasion/persuasion-communication-asking-for-permission/comment-page-1#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Rick Kirschner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drkblog.com/?p=107#comment-255</guid>
		<description>Situation or disposition...I like the distinction!  Just want to remind that disposition changes depending on the situation...what a person wants, who is around, time of day, time of week, time of month, time of year, blood sugar status, etc.  Fortunately, people are predictable, and if you can predict it you can plan for it.  

I like your approach here J.D. about questions.  My opinion is that if you&#039;re inclined to ask open ended questions, the possibilities provided by questions are limitless.  Questions are a terrific way of introducing information into a closed mind, of revealing the flaw in an idea, and of giving people a face saving way out while redirecting towards a better idea!  Questions allow us to help each other past stuck places in our thinking, tease open entrenched positions to find thinking room, and identify courses of action for important next steps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Situation or disposition&#8230;I like the distinction!  Just want to remind that disposition changes depending on the situation&#8230;what a person wants, who is around, time of day, time of week, time of month, time of year, blood sugar status, etc.  Fortunately, people are predictable, and if you can predict it you can plan for it.  </p>
<p>I like your approach here J.D. about questions.  My opinion is that if you&#8217;re inclined to ask open ended questions, the possibilities provided by questions are limitless.  Questions are a terrific way of introducing information into a closed mind, of revealing the flaw in an idea, and of giving people a face saving way out while redirecting towards a better idea!  Questions allow us to help each other past stuck places in our thinking, tease open entrenched positions to find thinking room, and identify courses of action for important next steps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.D. Meier</title>
		<link>http://theartofchange.com/wordpress/persuasion/persuasion-communication-asking-for-permission/comment-page-1#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>J.D. Meier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drkblog.com/?p=107#comment-251</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a fan of situational adaptability.

Speaking of context, email is a good example where I&#039;ve seen the ask vs. tell paths amplified.  Imagine the approval/appreciation seeking case of multiple mails ((1)would you like to meet? (2) when would be good for you? (3) I&#039;ll see if I can find something (4) sched+)) versus just sending the sched+, then readjusting from there.  In the approval/appreciation case, the multiple interaction is well received.  In the action-oriented case, it&#039;s, as you say, simply annoying because of time constraints.

&gt; asking for permission works well with almost everyone (just not all the time.) 
I&#039;m not sure whether the generalization is more about the situation or the disposition.  I originally thought it was more situtational -- that&#039;s intuitive -- but as I flashback, I see the patterns tied more to the people than the situations.  For example, with my manager, I&#039;ve never had a situation where asking permission was preferred, yet with his peers, asking permission was almost always preferred, in just about any situation.

I think it&#039;s safe to start with the assumption that asking permission works well with almost everyone, but if you find you&#039;re not effective with certain sets of people to test a more active mode.

On a somewhat related note -- questions can be more effective than statements because it causes a switch in focus, so if permission isn&#039;t the right question, a variation of questions can be particularly effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a fan of situational adaptability.</p>
<p>Speaking of context, email is a good example where I&#8217;ve seen the ask vs. tell paths amplified.  Imagine the approval/appreciation seeking case of multiple mails ((1)would you like to meet? (2) when would be good for you? (3) I&#8217;ll see if I can find something (4) sched+)) versus just sending the sched+, then readjusting from there.  In the approval/appreciation case, the multiple interaction is well received.  In the action-oriented case, it&#8217;s, as you say, simply annoying because of time constraints.</p>
<p>&gt; asking for permission works well with almost everyone (just not all the time.)<br />
I&#8217;m not sure whether the generalization is more about the situation or the disposition.  I originally thought it was more situtational &#8212; that&#8217;s intuitive &#8212; but as I flashback, I see the patterns tied more to the people than the situations.  For example, with my manager, I&#8217;ve never had a situation where asking permission was preferred, yet with his peers, asking permission was almost always preferred, in just about any situation.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s safe to start with the assumption that asking permission works well with almost everyone, but if you find you&#8217;re not effective with certain sets of people to test a more active mode.</p>
<p>On a somewhat related note &#8212; questions can be more effective than statements because it causes a switch in focus, so if permission isn&#8217;t the right question, a variation of questions can be particularly effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Rick Kirschner</title>
		<link>http://theartofchange.com/wordpress/persuasion/persuasion-communication-asking-for-permission/comment-page-1#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Rick Kirschner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drkblog.com/?p=107#comment-250</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment!  

Just to reiterate, there is a time and a place for everything, and it&#039;s never all the time and everyplace.  I stand by my statement that asking for permission works well with almost everyone (just not all the time.)  You&#039;ve identified a context where it served no purpose, and that&#039;s why I always recommend paying attention and observing the context before attempting a persuasive communication.  Like you, I can think of other contexts where asking permission would be perceived as evidence of lack of conviction, or simply be annoying because of time constraints or irritability. 

There&#039;s also an interesting tonal behavior of many gen -xers, that sounds like some kind of asking at the end of a statement.   You know?

be well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment!  </p>
<p>Just to reiterate, there is a time and a place for everything, and it&#8217;s never all the time and everyplace.  I stand by my statement that asking for permission works well with almost everyone (just not all the time.)  You&#8217;ve identified a context where it served no purpose, and that&#8217;s why I always recommend paying attention and observing the context before attempting a persuasive communication.  Like you, I can think of other contexts where asking permission would be perceived as evidence of lack of conviction, or simply be annoying because of time constraints or irritability. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s also an interesting tonal behavior of many gen -xers, that sounds like some kind of asking at the end of a statement.   You know?</p>
<p>be well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.D. Meier</title>
		<link>http://theartofchange.com/wordpress/persuasion/persuasion-communication-asking-for-permission/comment-page-1#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>J.D. Meier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drkblog.com/?p=107#comment-248</guid>
		<description>&gt; Specifically, it works well with people who have a communication need for approval and appreciation.
Very true!

&gt; This works well with almost everyone.
Less true.  I&#039;ve found it less effective in engineering organizations that are action-focused, high on the red scale.   In your terms, if somebody has a need for action, the ask/permission can be friction and irritation.

I can relate to this because I had a couple mentees that were heavy on ask mode, which worked great for approval/appreciation, but they weren&#039;t as effective w/some people.  They moved to &quot;be brief, be bright, be gone&quot; ... and got results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Specifically, it works well with people who have a communication need for approval and appreciation.<br />
Very true!</p>
<p>&gt; This works well with almost everyone.<br />
Less true.  I&#8217;ve found it less effective in engineering organizations that are action-focused, high on the red scale.   In your terms, if somebody has a need for action, the ask/permission can be friction and irritation.</p>
<p>I can relate to this because I had a couple mentees that were heavy on ask mode, which worked great for approval/appreciation, but they weren&#8217;t as effective w/some people.  They moved to &#8220;be brief, be bright, be gone&#8221; &#8230; and got results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
